Information Monitoring Strategies for Mud and Debris Flow Disaster Management
Keywords:
Mud and Debris Flow, Monitoring, Early Warning, Natural Hazards, Disaster Prevention and ControlAbstract
Mud and Debris flows are fast geological disasters that can lead to significant loss of life and wealth. In recent years, numerous methods for controlling debris flow disasters have been developed, with monitoring and prior warning systems being the maximum efficient and cost-efficient approach. This study analyzes the monitoring elements, like material sources, water sources, and the characteristics of debris flows, and compares current monitoring technologies and methods. This analysis helps in selecting appropriate monitoring techniques for preventing and managing real geological disasters, thereby avoiding resource waste.
References
Aria-Gonzalez, J.E., Delesalle, B., Salvat, B. & Galzin, R. (1997). Trophic functioning of the Tiahura reef sector. Moorea Island, French Polynesia. Coral Reefs, 16: 231-246.
Ban, N.C., Bodtker, K.M., Nicolson, D., Robb, C.K., Royle, K. & Short, C. (2013). Setting the stage for marine spatial planning: Ecological and social data collation and analyses in Canada's Pacific waters. Marine Policy, 39: 11-20.
Bigagli, E. (2016). The international legal framework for the management of the global oceans social-ecological system. Marine Policy, 68: 155-164.
Blau, J. and Green, L. (2015). Assessing the impact of a new approach to ocean management: evidence to date from five ocean plans. Marine Policy, 56: 1-8.
Borja, Á., Elliott, M., Carstensen, J., Heiskanen, A.S. & Van de Bund, W. (2010). Marine management–towards an integrated implementation of the European Marine Strategy Framework and the Water Framework Directives. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 60(12): 2175-2186.
Buhl-Mortensen, L., Galparsoro, I., Fernández, T.V., Johnson, K., D'Anna, G., Badalamenti, F. & Doncheva, V. (2017). Maritime ecosystem-based management in practice: Lessons learned from the application of a generic spatial planning framework in Europe. Marine Policy, 75: 174-186.
Christensen, V. & Walters, C.J. (2004). Trade-offs in ecosystem-scale optimization of fisheries management policies. Bulletin of Marine Science, 74(3): 549-562.
Coll, M., Bahamon, N., Sarda, F., Palomera, I., Tudela, S. & Suuronen, P. (2008). Ecosystems effects of improved trawl selectivity in the South Catalan Sea (NW Mediterranean). Marine Ecology Progress Series, 355: 131-147.
Coll, M., Shannon, L.J., Moloney, C.L., Palomera, I. & Tudela, S. (2006). Comparing trophic flows and fishing impacts of a NW Mediterranean ecosystem with coastal upwellings by means of standardized ecological models und indicators. Ecological Modelling, 198: 53-70.
Coll, M., Santojanni, A., Arneri, E., Palomera, I. and Tudela, S. (2007). An ecosystem model of the Northern and Central Adriatic Sea: analysis of ecosystem structure and fishing impacts. Journal of Marine Systems, 67: 119-154.
Cooper, J.A.G. (2011). Progress in integrated coastal zone management (ICZM) in Northern Ireland. Marine Policy, 35(6): 794-799.
Cruz, S., Robinson, J. & Tingey, R. (2016). Integrating participatory planning in the design of Belize’s marine replenishment zones. GIS/Spatial Analyses in Fishery and Aquatic Sciences, 6: 135-152.
Curtin, R. & Prellezo, R. (2010). Understanding marine ecosystem based management: a literature review. Marine Policy, 34(5): 821-830.
Douvere, F. (2008). The importance of marine spatial planning in advancing ecosystem-based sea use management. Marine Policy, 32(5): 762-771.
Foley, M.M., Halpern, B.S., Micheli, F., Armsby, M.H., Caldwell, M.R., Crain, C.M. & Steneck, R.S. (2010). Guiding ecological principles for marine spatial planning. Marine Policy, 34(5): 955-966.
Fournier, D.A., Hampton, J. & Sibert, J.R. (1998). MULTIFAN-CL; a length-based, age-structured model for fisheries stock assessment with application to South Pacific albacore Thunnus alalunga. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 55: 2105-2116.
Francis, R.I.C.C. 1992. Use of risk analysis to assess fishery management strategies: a case study using orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus) on the Chatham Rise, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 49: 922-930.
Gasalla, M.A. & Rossi-Wongtschowsk, C.L.D.B. (2004). Contribution of ecosystem analysis to investigating the effects of changes in fishing strategies in the South Brazil Bight coastal ecosystem. Ecological Modelling, 172: 283-106.
Gittings, J.A., Brewin, R.J., Raitsos, D.E., Kheireddine, M., Ouhssain, M., Jones, B.H. & Hoteit, I. (2019). Remotely sensing phytoplankton size structure in the Red Sea. Remote Sensing of Environment, 234: 111-387.
Gonzalez-Mirelis, G. & Buhl-Mortensen, P. (2015). Modelling benthic habitats and biotopes off the coast of Norway to support spatial management. Ecological Informatics, 30: 284-292.
Guisan, A. & Zimmermann, N.E. (2000). Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling, 135(2-3): 147-186.
Hall, S.J. & Mainprize, B. 2004. Towards ecosystem-based fisheries management. Fish and Fisheries, 5(1): 1-20.
Hilborn, R. (1979). Comparison of fisheries control systems that utilize catch and effort data. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 36: 1477-1489.
Katsanevakis, S., Stelzenmüller, V., South, A., Sorensen, T.K., Jones, P.J., Kerr, S. & Ter Hofstede, R. (2011). Ecosystem-based marine spatial management: review of concepts, policies, tools, and critical issues. Ocean & Coastal Management, 54(11): 807-820.
Kearney, M. & Porter, W. (2009). Mechanistic niche modelling: combining physiological and spatial data to predict species’ ranges. Ecology Letters, 12(4): 334-350.
Lester, S.E., McLeod, K.L., Tallis, H., Ruckelshaus, M., Halpern, B.S., Levin, P.S. & Parrish, J.K. (2010). Science in support of ecosystem-based management for the US West Coast and beyond. Biological Conservation, 143(3): 576-587.
Li, H. (2006). The impacts and implications of the legal framework for sea use planning and management in China. Ocean & Coastal Management, 49(9-10): 717-726.
Müller, F. (1997). State of the art in ecosystem theory. Ecological Modelling, 100: 15-161.
Nilsson, SG. & Nilsson, I. N. (1976). Number, food and consumption and fish predation by birds in Lake Mockeln Southern Sweden. Onis Scandinavian, 7: 61-70.
Ortiz, M. & Wolff, M. (2002). Dynamical simulation of mass-balance trophic models for benthic communities of north-central Chile: assessment of resilience time under alternative management scenarios. Ecological Modelling, 148: 277-291.
Pauly, D. (1980). On the interrelationships between natural mortality, growth parameters, and mean environmental temperature in 175 fish stocks. Journal du Conseil, Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer, 39: 175-192.
Portman, M.E. (2014). Visualization for planning and management of oceans and coasts. Ocean & Coastal Management, 98: 176-185.
Ricketts, P.J. (1992). Current approaches in geographic information systems for coastal management. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 25(1-4): 82-87.
Robinson, L.M., Elith, J., Hobday, A.J., Pearson, R.G., Kendall, B.E., Possingham, H.P. & Richardson, A.J. (2011). Pushing the limits in marine species distribution modelling: lessons from the land present challenges and opportunities. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 20(6): 789-802.
Rodríguez, I., Montoya, I., Sánchez, M.J. & Carreño, F. (2009). Geographic information systems applied to integrated coastal zone management. Geomorphology, 107(1-2): 100-105.
Rutherford, R.J., Herbert, G.J. & Coffen-Smout, S.S. (2005). Integrated ocean management and the collaborative planning process: the Eastern Scotian Shelf Integrated Management (ESSIM) Initiative. Marine Policy, 29(1): 75-83.
Stelzenmüller, V., Maynou, F., Bernard, G., Cadiou, G., Camilleri, M., Crec’hriou, R. & Pérez-Ruzafa, Á. (2008). Spatial assessment of fishing effort around European marine reserves: implications for successful fisheries management. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 56(12): 2018-2026.
Stergiou, K.I., Karpouzi, V. (2002). Feeding habits and trophic levels of Mediterranean fish. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 11: 217-254.
Ulanowicz, R.E. (1993). Inventing the ecoscope. In: Christensen, V. and Pauly, D. (Eds.), Trophic models of aquatic ecosystems. ICLARM Conference Proceedings, 26: 9-10.
Walters, C., Pauly, D., Christensen, V. and Kitchell, J.F., 2000. Representing density dependent consequences of life history strategies in aquatic ecosystems: EcoSim II. Ecosystems, 3, pp.70-83.
Walters, C.L., Christensen, V., Martell, S. & Kitchell, J.F. (2005). Single-species versus ecosystem harvest management: ecosystem structure erosion under myopic management. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 62: 558-568.
Watts, M.E., Ball, I.R., Stewart, R.S., Klein, C.J., Wilson, K., Steinback, C. & Possingham, H.P. (2009). Marxan with Zones: Software for optimal conservation based land-and sea-use zoning. Environmental Modelling & Software, 24(12): 1513-1521.
Wolff, M. (1994). A trophic model for Tongoy Bay -a system exposed to suspended scallop culture (Northern Chile). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 182: 149-168.
Yates, K.L., Schoeman, D.S. & Klein, C.J. (2015). Ocean zoning for conservation, fisheries and marine renewable energy: assessing trade-offs and co-location opportunities. Journal of Environmental Management, 152: 201
Zwanenburg, K.C. (2000). The effects of fishing on demersal fish communities of the Scotian Shelf. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 57: 503-508.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Submission of a manuscript to IS indicates that the work is original, has not been previously published (except as an abstract, lecture, or thesis), and is not under consideration by another journal. By submitting, authors affirm that their manuscript meets the journal’s ethical and editorial standards and that they agree to the terms of copyright and licensing upon acceptance.
Once accepted for publication, authors grant IS the first publication rights to the work. However, authors retain full copyright of their content and remain the legal owners of their intellectual property.
IS provides open access to all published articles six months after the release of the respective volume. Once the embargo period concludes, articles are made freely available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This license allows users to share, adapt, and reuse the work in any medium or format provided that appropriate credit is given to the original authors and the initial publication in this journal.
The journal's delayed open access model supports global knowledge dissemination, ensuring that research is accessible without financial or legal barriers. Authors are also encouraged to archive their published articles in institutional repositories, personal websites, or other platforms, with full citation of the journal version. Pre-print versions posted online should include a citation and link to the final published version in IS as soon as the issue is available; post-print versions (including the final publisher's PDF) should include a citation and link to the journal's website.
All materials published in the IS website are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution license, unless otherwise noted.